Random Muse

Philosophies which I do not comprehend often extend the description of the causal interrelationships between physical objects to imply that they are the consequence of the essential oneness of things. It requires a coagulating similarity to include everything, and this forms the essence of the category's identity. Our selection of objects that lie within the realm of the physical is such an example, where the senses are employed for the purposes of classification of the object. Of course, the first sentence begs the complex question of which came first and caused the other (for our understanding, and then in truth, each different and possibly inversed). Only with such knowledge will we be able to answer questions raised by the second sentence.