Note 27

Man as functional item.

All individuals are created with a unique psychological profile.

This unique profile is manifest in personal preference, personal interpretative outcomes, and personal needs.

The genetic pool of the being is evolutionarily tested by the conditions which impinge on the individual as mediated by the demands of environment, by the demands of society.

Society is a collection of individuals and their interactions with one another, reflecting both the living forces within the individuals that constantly actualize, that is, that serve as the bridge between past fact and the arbitrariness of present force, and the historical institutional agreements and unagreed coercive structures that have formed the ground on which one functions, on which one understands one's own functioning, and on which the re-interpretation of the present by living force always receives form from which to alter the present while preserving it.

Society functions as an organizational construct based on the possibility of rationalized social interactions that have been tested by the factors of power, of order, of satisfaction of mutually agreed and of granted rights.

Social constructs are innately unstable if not based on a certain set of real needs and the common interpretation of those needs. It is the commonness of the need, and the commonness of the belief system which re-interprets these needs without removing them, but securing and re-inforcing them instead, that forces the individual to define his role in terms of the functions he can play with regards to the Other. He conceives of his needs socially, and not only that, the solution is social - he has no sustainance from the environment itself.

That is, all thought is functional by working through intersubjectivities to create an interpretation of needs that functionalizes the individual, that applies his understanding and his capacities, and shapes his development, for the purpose of fulfilling common needs.

We interpret things in our ways, and the contrast in interpretations correspond to the needs that exist and want to be felt within the society that nurtures a sensitivity to those needs in the first place.

Of course, the point is that the individual is a means to a single end, the reconciliation of the subjective with the objective. The subjective need is a seperate existence for which all else is means. The outer always exists as a canvas for something to exist in terms of the inner. Insofar as the outer has been manipulated, has been made the object of attention, and the object of agency, the outer exists as an extension of the inner, and the advance of power consists in shaping, re-distorting, and increasing the variety of configurations of symbols of power to allow for the flourishing of individuals over the scarcity of bounded objectivity. Of course, the democracy of human needs provides an ample, and a sure insurance, for the satisfaction of absolute power over many human lives - but humans have thrived precisely because of the variety of powers which they have been able to pursue. In fact, it is precisely the creativeness of man that is required and has allowed for the flourishing of power over things that are mental, over conditions that are constructed and over tastes and nuances which have been trained so as to allow for the increasing complexity of the conditions which will generate outlets where none in fact is needed. Opinion leaders will continue to spur development: it is by defintion a competitive exercise. This understanding within a paradigm of power.

But what about the notion of a society with needs of its own? That is, the reverse view, where intersubjectivity is not only a fog of opinion, but is in fact, a living force which shapes the individual and gives him bearing? Here we have the picture of man as society - the tribal man - here we conduct an exercise of anthropology of oneself, at least within the limits of our understanding, on the basic premise that the living force of the meanings through which man exists in relation to his self-understanding is based on his relation to his external environment, and by definition, the living force of society.